[QUOTE=I thought Jay's "loophole" was the difference between "a" club and "the" club, and how that language was significantly less precise than the previous CBA.
This guys take makes more sense, that it's the unsigned status of O'Reilly that was key, not weak language that a lawyer can exploit.[/QUOTE]
just asking...Where does anyone confirm that this is what Jay's interpretation was? I've just been reading all of the posts on this thread and others, and the various articles on this subject, and it seems that a lot of persons are now acknowledging that the was not a bungled transaction and was something that actually has some thought put into it, albeit a gamble.
|