Quote:
Originally Posted by valo403
That's exactly what you said.
On the basis of a statement that he was on a mailing list.
|
No i didn't!
I said Flanagan's should. Don't try to spin comments to your liking.
Yes he should be questioned by the RCMP due to his comments and they should determine from those interviews do they have enough legal suspicion based on his answers to be investigated.
If you Valo said publicly you thought child pornography was ok to view see what happens with your friendships your career and the law.
You know what you think your so damn slick I challenge you to publicly post it on you tube and in return i will post on you tube what my beliefs are about Child Pornography and what
should be the allowable suspicion that the RCMP needs to obtain a search warrant of a private device.
Post on you tube your name and Simply that you are ok with Child Pornoagraphy as a simple experiment and lets just see if the RCMP pays you a visit eventually.
And leave it open for comments.
For the record do i think you Valo are ok with Child Pornography no you probably are not, but why you would argue with me about Flanagan saying this garbage is well personally i think just for the sake of arguing.
Enough bickering we couldn't further apart on this topic.