Quote:
Originally Posted by sven
Clever Iggy,do you agree with Rubicant's post?
If you do, then I think we are just arguing semantics because I'm an advocate of option 1 while I "think" you might be agreeing with option 2.
In any case, Feaster screwed up and that's the main issue
Unless you are like Blankall who is convinced Feaster did the right thing
|
I think we are at the semantics point. I don't think Feaster is just trying to COA with the statement. I believe it to be genuine. Whether neglecting to check with the NHL/PA to confirm is more or less egregious than not knowing about the provision at all is moot.
Also, I don't think Blankall is trying to convince anyone that Feaster's actions are right, just that his interpretation of the CBA provision is reasonable or at least that the provision is ambiguous.