Quote:
Originally Posted by Clever_Iggy
As our inside guy, ask him for us!
Well for one, since ROR is now under contract with the Avs, I don't think he can. Please confirm.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rubicant
As fun as the virtual CP courtroom is in terms of who's interpretation is correct, why does it even matter?
Feaster either:
- didn't know about the clause, which is negligent
- or was so confident in his interpretation he didn't bother to check before filing an offer sheet. The potential loss there being a 1st and 3rd round pick, a 2.5 M signing bonus and not even having the player on the team. That is worse than negligent IMO.
Feaster is a desperate man, and he is likely to cause long term damage to this team if left in charge.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by nik-
The Flames own statement said they only talked to an NHLPA rep, and not even what type of rep, it could have been an agent.
You don't get to skate because "you didn't know". This is the big leagues, not the CHL.
|
Clever Iggy,do you agree with Rubicant's post?
If you do, then I think we are just arguing semantics because I'm an advocate of option 1 while I "think" you might be agreeing with option 2.
In any case, Feaster screwed up and that's the main issue
Unless you are like Blankall who is convinced Feaster did the right thing