Quote:
Originally Posted by Stay Golden
I don't validate your point comparing a non child pornographic photo innocent picture to being on the mailing list for as he said "a couple of years" of NAMBLA.
That is a grand canyon sized stretch you are making.
If my best friend my very best friend said to me child pornagraphy is ok to look at i would ask are you serious what do you mean by that?
To see if he was joking or not?
I would ask him so do you check it out?
If he said yes.
Even if he was my very best friend i would notify the police.
I would leave it up to the police on what they want to do with that information.
For crying out loud we are talking about child pornography not just pornography.
You tell me can you under Canadian law have on your laptop Adult porn male or female, can you have Child porn on your laptop?
Why is that i think you know exactly why one is allowed and one isn't.
Do you have a higher toleration for child pornography i make my stand against it crystal clear.
|
You don't validate it? What does that even mean? Honestly your posts are virtually incomprehensible but I'll do my best.
I don't think you have a clue what the argument against your stance is. You've somehow turned it into people having a higher tolerance for child pornography, which is not only completely inaccurate it's also disgusting. Nobody has said anything that could even be remotely considered to say that. What people have taken issue with is the idea that the authorities should have the ability to "tear someones life apart" on the basis of little to no evidence.
A statement that you were signed up for a mailing list is not sufficient grounds for a search. If I got a hold of your email address and signed you up, and you then posted about it here, your stance would make it perfectly acceptable to have your life torn apart. Do you not see how absolutely insane that is? Being on a mailing list is not illegal and not grounds for any type of search.