Quote:
Originally Posted by malcolmk14
|
BTW I know this probably wouldn't be a valid argument in court but if the intention was to include any RFA's or Reserve players in the exemption, like some of you are saying in terms of "A club's list" being ambigious, then why would they not just clearly state "All RFA's or Reserves will be exempt"...
It's extremely obvious what the actual intended and agreed upon meaning was. This would have all been back pedalling to try and disprove that and the fact that Feaster would be willing to risk a 1st and 3rd round pick on that without verifying from both the NHL and the NHLPA, just screams incompetence.