Quote:
Originally Posted by sven
So let's get this straight. Feaster (being a well educated law man) sees the phrasing in question and reads / understands it completely differently from rest of society (I guess he's the only genius?)
OR
He sees phrasing that he believes can be circumvented and went through with this offer fully knowing that he's going to have to go through a #### storm and arbitration where he has a slim chance of winning?
OR option 3
This was an oversight and he obviously isn't going to admit to his mistake and spin it that best way he can?
Which one is most likely folks?
|
Everybody interpreted the rule the way Feaster did until one reporter found differently.
There was heavy talk of an offer sheet before what the Flames did. Bob McKenzie highlighted it as a possibility.
I'm not taking away the significance of this situation. I think something has to happen.
But it is funny. Everybody was talking about a potential offer sheet for ROR. Now that the Flames are the ones who made it, everyone acts as if the rule was obvious.