Quote:
Originally Posted by sven
So let's get this straight. Feaster (being a well educated law man) sees the phrasing in question and reads / understands it completely differently from rest of society (I guess he's the only genius?)
OR
He sees phrasing that he believes can be circumvented and went through with this offer fully knowing that he's going to have to go through a #### storm and arbitration where he has a slim chance of winning?
OR option 3
This was an oversight and he obviously isn't going to admit to his mistake and spin it that best way he can?
Which one is most likely folks?
|
Did you read the thing? It is not clear.
And I still voted for him getting fired as its not worth the risk of losing the player and the picks.