Quote:
Originally Posted by polak
This is getting ridiculous.
I didn't know it was a judges job to believe in the most far fetched, completely asinine interpretation of a rule.
I'd love to hear an explanation of how the Flames would argue their case.
Go.
|
Honestly man you really have no idea how many cases there are that you think would be simple that aren't. You seem to just be glossing over my previous responses to you, but the bottom line is that if the parties didn't have an actual meeting of intent a court/arbitrator can completely reconstruct or discard with the clause.