Quote:
Originally Posted by malcolmk14
Neil Smith on the Fan 960 (Former NHL General Manager)
on the statement from the Flames: "Of course they're going to defend their position, they don't want to look like they were not knowledgeable in this situation.
Bill Daly and Gary Bettman wrote the CBA, Daly's interpretation of it is more likely to be correct than Jay Feaster (paraphrase)
|
If Feaster proved it to be ambiguous though, wouldn't any court rule against the side that wrote it (in this case, Daly) in accordance to Contra Proferentem? His interpretation may be more correct, but unless it's unambiguous in the CBA, it's pretty meaningless.
Not trying to be antagonistic, but that's my interpretation of law. I could be wrong here.