Quote:
Originally Posted by Makarov
What about murder, manslaughter, aggravated assault, sexual assault, impaired driving causing death, etc? These offences are all at least as, if not far more, morally blameworthy than possession of child pornography? Shall we throw away the Charter on the mere whiff of baseless suspicion of any of these offences as well?
|
the topic at hand is not "murder, manslaughter, aggravated assault, sexual assault, impaired driving causing death", etc?
But it is safe to say that murder, manslaughter, aggravated assault, sexual assault has a long list of victims in relation to the Child Pornography industry.
Sorry i have 0% tolerance of Child Pornography and the laws world wide need to be drastically much more severe and standardized.
No grey areas. None.
Possession x amount of years.
Distributing x amount of years.
Producing x amount of years.
Child Abduction x amount of years.
Trafficking Children x amount of years.
Raping Children x amount of years. Its not sexual assault by the way or having sex with a child. The Politicians need to change that it is rape, its not sex.
Its all relative and only the government has the true power to make the necessary changes and someone like Flanagan stating that Child Pornography is ok is part of the much bigger problem.
Come on guy its why people across Canada are outraged.