Quote:
Originally Posted by LickTheEnvelope
In this case that wouldn't matter since O'Reilly wouldn't have been on the Flame's RFA list to start the season, and would not have been on it until after he had signed and cleared waivers (based on the existing rule... as mentioned there are only comments out there on the amendment).
|
no you are misunderstanding the point...
The Summary does not specify the player has to be on the signing team's RFA list. All it says is the player has to be on "a club's" RFA list.
"a club" implies that if the player is on any team's RFA list he is exempt. In any case its arguable. If the intention is for only the signing club, the language should read "the club's RFA list"