Quote:
Originally Posted by TheyCallMeBruce
Trying to ask some questions here, so bare with me. I'd like to start off by saying I do not condone child porn.
However, what qualifies as child porn? I think we can all agree raping a child and filming it qualifies. What about taking a picture of a nude child? Or how about if a child takes a picture of him/herself and posts it on the internet?
Is that what he's trying to get at? He doesn't make it clear what he's getting at.
Or is all the above wrong (end of discussion)?
To be clear, I am not defending his statements. I am just trying to play devils advocate and also, I just got in trouble with my boss for not asking more why, what, where, how questions, so I'm in the 5 W mode right now.
|
I think I know what you are trying to say...
To me the defining difference is "what" the picture is used for.
It could be an innocent picture of kids playing on a beach, posted on Facebook by the family. But someone uploads it to a pedo site and it starts to circulate that way.
Now the use of the photo has changed and created victims.