Quote:
Originally Posted by Pierre "Monster" McGuire
It's not weird as all. If they would've claimed him off of waivers, the Flames would be at 50 contracts. Since they traded Piskula for him, they're still at 49.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Roof-Daddy
Not really weird at all IMO. If they would have claimed him, the Flames would have 50 contracts.
Now that Feaster traded Piskula for him, we still have 49.
|
Guess that makes sense then. Shows though that Feaster though has failed to live up to his flexibility billing since he put himself right up to the limit.