Quote:
Originally Posted by oldschoolcalgary
well, this is going to lead back to the glass half full/half empty discourse....
no matter what any expert says, people are going to think our prospects are better than the assessments....unfortunately, in the last 25 years, we've haven't had a lot of success drafting. Granted, different regimes...but the results haven't been good.
|
That's a different argument, though.
I'm just talking about brit's comment that besides JG the rest of our prospects have had bad years. Really?
And in Wilson't article he mentioned that if Gillies has another great year or improves then he will be a legit prospect. He's not already a legit prospect?
And players like Sieloff who was never drafted to be an offensive force, or a kid like Jankowski who everyone knows is a long-term project have poor rankings because their PPG is low.
It's a pretty silly way to determine if someone has a shot at making the NHL or not.