View Single Post
Old 02-25-2013, 04:15 PM   #131
getbak
Franchise Player
 
getbak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Calgary, AB
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Eagle Eye View Post
Although it is obvious that this will happen, but I still hate the thought of so many 'late' away games while playing against the Pacific time zone teams.
In the end, it's only 3 more west coast games over the course of an 82 game season.

Under the current set-up, the Flames play: Vancouver (PT), Edmonton (MT), Colorado (MT), and Minnesota (CT) three times each on the road. They play San Jose (PT), LA (PT), Anaheim (PT), Phoenix (MT*), Dallas (CT), Chicago (CT), St Louis (CT), Nashville (CT), Detroit (ET), and Columbus (ET) twice each on the road. Plus, they play one road game against 9 of the Eastern Conference teams (all of which are in ET except Winnipeg).

So that's 9 games in PT; 8 in MT; 11 in CT; and 13 in ET (it would have been 12 CT and 12 ET any season where they played in Winnipeg).


Under the proposed alignment, the Flames will play: VAN, SJS, LAK, ANA, PHX, and EDM 3 times each on the road; and every other team in the league once on the road.

That works out to: 12 games in PT; 7 in MT; 6 in CT; and 16 in ET.


Even back in the days when Vancouver and LA were the only west coast teams, the Flames played 8 road games in the Pacific time zone.
__________________
Turn up the good, turn down the suck!
getbak is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to getbak For This Useful Post: