Quote:
Originally Posted by FAN
The problem is that Feaster likely sees "compete next year" as having a healthy #1 goalie (Kipper), and keeping Iginla, Cammy, Glencross, because you can't replace them.
Intellectual honesty can mean a lot of things. It seems clear that intellectual honestly to Feaster means competing for the playoffs and not "Stanley Cup Contender" that or it's the "everything can happen once you get into the playoffs" mentality.
|
Not much he can do if ownership mandate is to compete for playoff spot, year after year. If the mandate stays the same, and he is given clearance to trade some of those players you listed, it wouldn't be for picks or prospects that are years away from making the NHL. More than likely it would be for players that would hep the flames this year and next. Ownership has to change the mandate.