Quote:
Originally Posted by kehatch
The day that the Flames start winning and prove people like me wrong is the day people like you get to climb on your high horse. At the moment you look pretty awkward and your steed is a donkey.
This isn't about Irving. Or Taylor. It is about the fact that the team is near last place, had a top line that includes Blake Comeau, and has MacDonald + Taylor as the goalies.
The present state was likely and predictable and many of us have been saying this for some time. Our best chance is to trade Kipper and Iginla for a smitten of what we could have got a couple of seasons ago. Worst case is we keep doing this until the bottom completely falls out and we lose them for nothing.
I am afraid your 'But Taylor could be good' argument comes off a bit weak in a series of maybes and could bes that predictably got us to present state.
It is time to call a dog a dog. And the Flames are a dog. With fleas. Big ones. But some of you will continue to see something grander no matter how hard the facts hit you in the face.
|
What have you said here, in this post, that has anything to do with the topic of the thread?
C4L is 100% right. The "rebuild" crowd is just trying to turn this story to fit some sort of argument.
We get it. You guys want to rebuild.
Guess what? Irving sucks. He has sucked. He has sucked for the last 2 years. He has zero value. You may think the "Taylor might be good" argument is a bad one, but I think the "Irving has been awful" argument is pretty good.
You want the organization to look for a goalie? Well, they are. They are going to give Taylor the opportunity he has earned.
I don't understand the arguments in this thread. Contradiction after contradiction.