Quote:
Originally Posted by Clever_Iggy
Well, I cant speak for the poster you're quoting, but I'm interested in where the line is drawn. Is it for all names based on or in reference to Natives/Indians/Aboriginals/First Nations? Or just ones that are tied to negative connotations/perceptions? Genetic references v. specific tribes?
|
Think about it in terms of what the symbol represents. Does the symbol invoke an idea of stereotyping and dominance?
Names such as "Chiefs" or "Natives" (Indians as well, that extent) invoke only imagery of the ethnic group themselves. It's not trying to sell an ideology with it.
An example would be the difference between calling a team "The Romans" and "The Guido's". "Romans" would be nothing more than calling back to a historical mythology. "Guido's" send a racist message about the certain group.
Does that clear that issue?