View Single Post
Old 02-13-2013, 01:41 PM   #62
Split98
Franchise Player
 
Split98's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Ontario
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Clever_Iggy View Post
Well, I cant speak for the poster you're quoting, but I'm interested in where the line is drawn. Is it for all names based on or in reference to Natives/Indians/Aboriginals/First Nations? Or just ones that are tied to negative connotations/perceptions? Genetic references v. specific tribes?
There's no issue with referencing a culture whatsoever, that's not the argument.

The argument is using offensive terms or imagery to reference them.

I see no issue with the Chiefs or Braves, but the ones in question are not 'honouring' a culture, they're insulting them.

The three teams that have been under fire I see are deservedly so. The involvement of other teams have only been brought up by those mocking this standpoint. The Redskins, the Blackhawks and the Indians are the only 3 I see being blatantly ignorant.

So that's the line. If you're blatantly offending someone with no regard for respect... then it shouldn't be the name and/or logo of your sports franchise.
Split98 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Split98 For This Useful Post: