View Single Post
Old 02-12-2013, 08:47 PM   #24
HOOT
Franchise Player
 
HOOT's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GGG View Post
This realignment is great if you keep the first two rounds of the playoffs in conference. Epic rivalries are based on geography and post season battles. In the 8 team playoff seeding you dont het enough repeat matchups year to year. 16 would be worse.
87 games was a bit of a joke just trying to make it 3 games per team. I'm basically in favour of that type of playoff system regardless of system. Even if they did something like these current conferences (which is bush league IMO) and take the top 2 from each conference and then the next 8 teams in the standings.

And since the East already has the travel advantage you would think they would make it 8 teams in the East per conference to even that out a little.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by henriksedin33 View Post
Not at all, as I've said, I would rather start with LA over any of the other WC playoff teams. Bunch of underachievers who look good on paper but don't even deserve to be in the playoffs.
HOOT is offline   Reply With Quote