Quote:
Originally Posted by Hack&Lube
Why do these people even get to vote and squabble on who lives or dies leading to this mess where you waste 20 minutes trying to figure out who's in charge of this pathetic rescue team?
Somebody take charge and say "we're going to rescue these people in an order that guarantees the highest numbers of survivors" with adjustment based on the willingness of the people to be rescued. They need to have a choice in this also. If anything, they are the ones who should be voting. Not you.
To really fix this experiment and make it interesting (or a made for TV movie), the participants should be the "victims" and they should be trying to figure out who goes first...The participants shouldn't be the rescuers.
|
Just thinking about this more... I know it takes approx 5-min for an efficient individual to set up a anchor/rigging system, if obvious (not having whatever tree's to sling and other anchor points be >120 degrees to the strong point of your anchor. There is 5 min there to get a situation analysis, and you know this would be concurrently with the profiling. This is, of coarse, assuming this is a unilateral, isolated decision making process. And what are the factors in this rescue, and if they are ready to be hauled up or if you need to send in a man for the rescue.