View Single Post
Old 02-06-2013, 05:34 PM   #18
GP_Matt
First Line Centre
 
GP_Matt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Edmonton
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Azure View Post
I wouldn't agree with the pipeline until they go WAY above and beyond to make sure it is safe.

And yes I understand that no pipeline means more transportation by rail, which is far more dangerous.
If anyone in BC was truly worried about the dangers of the pipeline they would have asked for assurances like more shut down valves, more frequent pigging, and stricter controls on the crossings. None of that was brought up, because it was offered right from the start. Christie Clark just asked for more money.
GP_Matt is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to GP_Matt For This Useful Post: