[CaptainCrunch]

You clearly have no clue about what your talking about and are pulling stuff our of your a$$.

Again, so you can plainly understand it.

the morality of the war has nothing to do with him executing his orders as long as they are not orders that require him to perpetrate intentional atrocities.

Which he did not do unless you can prove that.

If someone is creeping up on his fellow soldiers, its not his job to say, oh wow man we shouldn't be here, so go ahead and take a free shot at my comrades.

It doesn't matter if they were insurgents or so called embarrassed Iraqi's (which is the absolutely stupidest term that I've ever heard) they were carrying weapons, they were a threat his only consideration is removing the threat.

The argument of morality, or war crimes or whatever does not resonate to the level of the average troop unless he is ordered to execute unarmed civilians, or toss them down a well with a live grenade of systematically rape woman for example.

And whether its up close with a knife or a km away with a sniper rifle is irrelevant. In any battle where I am fighting at a squad level to basically extend my life of the life of my squad mates then you take any advantage that you can get.

Your post and the other ones like it are ridiculous.