View Single Post
Old 02-01-2013, 10:46 AM   #386
Zarley
First Line Centre
 
Zarley's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by yads View Post
A few things on the Norway comparison. In addition to not being our own country, we don't have what basically amounts to a government owned oil company like Statoil.

Another question I have is what should the plan be for the Heritage fund? At what point is it acceptable to start spending it? Is the plan to have everyone employed by the government once industry packs up and leaves? If anything I would support spending a percentage of the money we make from resource revenue now to invest in alternative industry: high tech, manufacturing, alternative energy, etc. So that when the resources run out/become worthless, the entire economy doesn't collapse.
The principal of the Heritage Savings fund should never be withdrawn and spent. We as a province should be investing a significant portion of yearly royalty income into the fund, with the aim of creating an endowment that will yield enough interest income (in perpetuity) to replace royalties in the distant future once the oil dries up. Essentially converting a non-renewable revenue source to a renewable one via investment.

This was Lougheed's initial goal for the fund, but subsequent governments have unfortunately lost sight of this.
Zarley is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Zarley For This Useful Post: