View Single Post
Old 01-28-2013, 09:15 AM   #119
JayP
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Flames in 07 View Post
Looks good, that should keep the lowest common denominator, populist alderman happy.

Not using public money because the owners and players of a team will stand to be more profitable, is a silly, petty, misery loves company confirming reason. If someone didn't want to use public money because they believe in a better use then that's different. But who cares if NHL owners are richer, if that's the best use for funds then you allocate in that way. People make money personally as a result of how public funds are used all the time.
It seems to make perfect sense to me. Why should the city be funding an arena the Flames owners can afford to build themselves and will reap all the profits from? There is basically no financial incentive for the city to be involved.
JayP is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to JayP For This Useful Post: