Quote:
Originally Posted by Captain_Obvious
You seem to be confused. The last few points I've brought up have been with different posters confused on particular points of the rules.
Upset I didn't read your private message? This following me around out of spite really needs to stop, friend.
|
You're boring man.
I was trying to have a hockey discussion and you again turn this into a personal thing.
Back to the topic at hand here, the Gagner interference call is a judgement call. You're on about how you can't understand why people can't accept that it was interference. All I was saying that it's a judgement call, there's two sides to this judgement. You lean one way, others lean the other. Pretty simple really. You think it's cut and dry interfernce, others don't think that it is.
The fact that Kerry Fraser and others have debated this the last 24 hours pretty much shows that it's not the one sided argument that you believe it is.
If the interference was that blatant, no chance Fraser writes the column. He's trying to help people understand the call as he sees it given his experience.