Quote:
Originally Posted by RougeUnderoos
Yeah, kinda makes you wonder.
Why do authorities even have to "decide" what happens to it? Seems pretty cut and dried to me. Euthanize the dog. End of discussion. It's not like it's a person that deserves a fair trial.
Really, who would care besides the owner? And who cares what he thinks?
And of course "it's not a bad dog, it's a bad owner", so why doesn't this bad owner pay some real consequences? Can this idiot go to the slammer for not looking after this "not bad dog"?
|
This is a clear example of a bad owner. Dog bit him, he didn't take the necessary steps to prevent and then rectify the problem from the start.
He should be charged. Get proper regulations in place and fine these kinds of owners through the roof. The owner of the dog should have been forced into mandatory training from the start.
This owner should not own any dog.
Whoa, this dog has attacked multiple times? Is the family insane? Clearly a person who should not own any pets.
For those calling for the ban, a German Shepherd, Rottweiler, Husky etc could have done just as much damage. This dog being out after multiple attacks on different people is irresponsibility all around.
WHY DOES A TEENAGER OWN ANY DOG LET ALONE A PITBULL? Insanity.