View Single Post
Old 01-06-2013, 05:01 PM   #266
GGG
Franchise Player
 
GGG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: California
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SebC View Post
If we're adding a new family to Calgary, that family can pay the cost of being added.
This is interesting?

Are large cities (population not sprawl) more expensive to run than small cities? (I dont know?)

If so then as a group we should all pay more when more people are added as there are economic benefits to a larger city. The last person to the party shouldn't be completely burdened with all of the associated costs from their addition as they in theory provide economic benifit.

Also are there reasoanlbe family friendly options in the inner city now? (3 bedroom townhouse for less than 500k, 400k, or 300k). If there aren't any affordable options then really tis is just a debate on whether Childless people should subsidize families or not and not really about sprawl.

Last edited by GGG; 01-06-2013 at 09:31 PM.
GGG is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to GGG For This Useful Post: