Quote:
Originally Posted by GGG
I agree with you on what the law states. But I strongly disagree that the law is just. This guy is getting screwed over because he gave a gift of a child to another couple. No one is disputing the facts in the case but this guy gets screwed over. It is clear the intent of all parties was to have him give up his paternity but because the state doesn't want to support the kid they want a 3rd party to.
|
I completely disagree. This guy isn't getting screwed over any more than anyone else who decides that they have the ability to do what they choose without any consideration for the law. You cannot contract around law, we both know that, but somehow this guy figured he could.
And the state is in the right to not support this child when there is a person out there who should be. Why should the state as a collective pay for a child that this goofball brought into the world via this ridiculous scheme?