The requirement to use a clinic really is discriminatory against poor people and those in non typical situations (F/F). The reason this is likely done is either they couldn't afford to go to a clinic or a clinic refused to do it because they were a lesbian couple. So in this way the current law is very unfair.
Intent is what should matter overall, it was the intent of the couple that the donor wasn't to have any liability and no one is disputing that. That should matter. For people who can't concieve and need to use these services cases like this make it more difficult to find doners, surrogetes, etc.
|