Quote:
Originally Posted by undercoverbrother
To be clear it is not my intention to be thick (I just am).
So if the fact picture is the same, with the exception of the parents being a M/F (not a F/F) then it is possible the courts would link the male parent to the child, and not the sperm donor?
|
If I read the case right, I think it would still apply. Either one of the couples suddenly can't work, the remaining one doesn't make enough to support the family, and the court chases the surrogate donor for child support. Doesn't matter that it's a F/F couple.