[T@T]

Originally Posted by troutman

Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL)

Carl Sagan would be proud: NASA's Kepler Mission confirms estimates of at least 100 billion planets in our galaxy alone.

Full story: http://go.nasa.gov/ZgEVTx

http://www.caltech.edu/content/planets-abound

To do that calculation, the Caltech team determined the probability that an M-dwarf system would provide Kepler-32's edge-on orientation. Combining that probability with the number of planetary systems Kepler is able to detect, the astronomers calculated that there is, on average, one planet for every one of the approximately 100 billion stars in the galaxy. But their analysis only considers planets that are in close orbits around M dwarfs—not the outer planets of an M-dwarf system, or those orbiting other kinds of stars. As a result, they say, their estimate is conservative. In fact, says Swift, a more accurate estimate that includes data from other analyses could lead to an average of two planets per star.

The implications of a galaxy chock full of planets are far-reaching, the researchers say. "It's really fundamental from an origins standpoint," says Swift, who notes that because M dwarfs shine mainly in infrared light, the stars are invisible to the naked eye. "Kepler has enabled us to look up at the sky and know that there are more planets out there than stars we can see."

It will probably be proven soon(not our lifetime soon) that over 90% of stars have planets in orbit, 100 billion planets will be nothing compaired to realilty.