Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community - View Single Post

mykalberta · 01-03-2013, 03:32 PM

I ask because in the article its the birth mother with the health issues, not the female partner (non birth mother)

If the couple was a man/woman would not the non-bio father be then financially responsible? Or would the male(non-bio father) also not be responsible because it wasnt a legit sperm donation?

Could not the sperm donor fight this in court if the couple pressured him to not go through a clinic (likely less expensive for the couple) and yet are now trying to offload the costs onto him?

I guess I am wondering why the state wouldnt go through the other non-bio parent in this situation for the money.

01-03-2013, 03:32 PM	#54
mykalberta Franchise Player Join Date: Aug 2005 Location: Calgary Exp:	I ask because in the article its the birth mother with the health issues, not the female partner (non birth mother) If the couple was a man/woman would not the non-bio father be then financially responsible? Or would the male(non-bio father) also not be responsible because it wasnt a legit sperm donation? Could not the sperm donor fight this in court if the couple pressured him to not go through a clinic (likely less expensive for the couple) and yet are now trying to offload the costs onto him? I guess I am wondering why the state wouldnt go through the other non-bio parent in this situation for the money. __________________ MYK - Supports Arizona to democtratically pass laws for the state of Arizona Rudy was the only hope in 08 2011 Election: Cons 40% - Nanos 38% Ekos 34% Last edited by mykalberta; 01-03-2013 at 03:34 PM.