Quote:
Originally Posted by Hemi-Cuda
she has no biological connection to the child and there is no way to prove that she had anything to do with the conception. she could just say she never wanted a child and that's why she left
|
Both women and the donor signed the agreement relieving him of parental/financial responsibility, so it seems like there would be proof that she intended to be a mother to this child. I can only assume that the state of Kansas doesn't recognize that a child can have two mothers, but either way, it doesn't seem right to come after the donor in this specific case.