View Single Post
Old 12-31-2012, 08:48 PM   #25
Matty81
Franchise Player
 
Matty81's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Alberta_Beef View Post
I doubt they are allowed to put on such conditions. It would be a conflict of interest
Wouldn't be formally allowed in writing or anything but Calgary held the hammer in terms of letting him come back and the Wheaties got a huge asset that will probably bring them a 1st round pick ++ for nothing. I know when WHL GMs are trying to get top picks to come down midseason from other leagues there are usually a lot of promises made. From McCrimmon's point of view, if the Flames said sure you can have the asset for nothing as long as you don't trade him to the chuk I can't see him saying no. Maybe they are more ethical than that.

Just a random thought anyway. Should be an interesting WHL trade deadline next week.
Matty81 is offline   Reply With Quote