Quote:
Originally Posted by RichKlit
I think im trying to hard to defend a position i dont truly believe in. I agree cost has to be considered, what im getting at is no stone should be left unturned, if the right answer happens to be the most expensive should we just dismiss it? I think im playing in the land of idealism where those in power in US would find money from the defense budget or wherever to do whats right by there children and really for themselves regardless of cost.
It's very hard to argue with the hard facts of gun control, so i guess i'll stop lol.
|
There are a whole lot of things that those in power in the US should do to help children, but when they attempt to help children with access to food, health care, education--well those kids are just moochers and why should they benefit from my hard earned money? Children in this country, unless born into privilege, are all too often given up on. It goes so far beyond protecting them from nutjobs with firearms. If they can't provide all children with a decent education, I doubt they're going to find a way to fix this.