Quite a few of my esteemed pro-gun facebook friends are posting this article:
http://larrycorreia.wordpress.com/20...n-gun-control/
Quote:
So now that there is a new tragedy the president wants to have a “national conversation on guns”. Here’s the thing. Until this national conversation is willing to entertain allowing teachers to carry concealed weapons, then it isn’t a conversation at all, it is a lecture.
Now when I say teachers carrying concealed weapons on Facebook I immediately get a bunch of emotional freak out responses. You can’t mandate teachers be armed! Guns in every classroom! Emotional response! Blood in the streets!
No. Hear me out. The single best way to respond to a mass shooter is with an immediate, violent response. The vast majority of the time, as soon as a mass shooter meets serious resistance, it bursts their fantasy world bubble. Then they kill themselves or surrender. This has happened over and over again.
|
It's worth a read because it's not complete baloney - as in, despite its many, many flawed arguments, at least it somewhat makes sense (as opposed to most views from the NRA's boosters). Anyway, this is the best I've seen from the pro-gun nutjobs in the states, and even this isn't very good.