Quote:
Originally Posted by Knalus
So, in your mind, a town of a population of 300,000, and growing at 20%, spending $100 million a year, and a city of a population of 3,000,000, growing at 5%, spending $100 million a year, would you say the town is underspending? Because you are comparing the growth rates to the city? Cause that's what you are trying to say here about Alberta and Quebec.
|
A place that has a fast growing population would have a higher need to improve infrastructure to account for that growth, no?
Its not like all this spending is just direct services like paying nurses, teachers or other maintenance costs. We have to build more schools, hospitals and interchanges as well.