Quote:
|
Originally Posted by 4X4
You're kidding me. Holy Crap. I just read your post again BBS. Are you actually comparing Glenmore to 64th?
You really are a notch below.
|
Where the hell did I do that.
You went off about how it's stupid that every interchange is diferent on deerfoot so I used a literary techniqute used as sarcasm to point out that 64th and Glenmore are two entirely different streets and therefore warrant different designs of interchanges. But I suppose the best way to win an arguement is to make up what the other side said.
Seriously dude, where did I say I blindly follow the rules, I speed as much as the next guy, but unlike you I understand that design conditions dictate what posted speed limits are. They aren't arbitray and I me, you or anyone else decides they want to go faster they are welcome to, but for the average driver (I never have and never will argue that there are a lot of bad drivers in Calgary) that is what is safe.
See dude, one thing you don't understand is that roads have to be made safe for the worst drivers, not the best, if they made them for the best drivers all roads would have 200 kph speed limits.
Seriously dude all you've done in this tread is say "I know how to drive and you don't" like 50 times. Care to come up with something a little more insightful.
You said the speed limits are too low, so i've explained why speed limits are the way they are. So you said I don't know how to drive.
You said it's stupid that every interchange isn't the same and isn't a cloverleaf. So, I gave you an perfect example of why not all interchanges are cloverleafes (Shag and Crowchild), and expalined that vastly different roads (64th and Glemore) have different requirements for an interchage. So you said "Holy crap I can't beleive you think 64th and Glenmore are exactly the same".
Well done sir, I can see I've been truly out thought by a master of debate, why talk about a subjet logically when you can simply say the same thing over and over again no matter how irrelevant.