Quote:
Originally Posted by crazy_eoj
Not at all, I just think there has to be acknowledgement that firearms are really the only way to combat these instances.
|
Could you imagine if people started firing back in a dark movie theatre in Denver? Do you not think that more people could have been hurt?
What happens if the first person to take out their gun to get the attacker is shot by another person packing because it is thought in the moment they are part of the first attack?
I would say the best way to combat easy killings is by removing these dangerous types of guns like he was using. I'm sorry but there is no way this kid would be able to find access to an assault rifle if it wasn't in his home. He wasn't living in the hood in Chicago, this was little town middle of nowhere.
I just don't understand how more guns would equal less deaths. Any stats to show this?