Quote:
Originally Posted by Codes
I think the point Crunch is making is that while some of these other aircraft have comparable specifications, they are essentially already on their way to obsoletion. I am of the mind that we should spend more to buy the superior aircraft that will still be relevant in the years to come.
However, I don't mean to imply carte blanche on spending, but if the price point per plane for the F-35 program is reduced to closer to what we were promised, then I think that is the most effective use of our defense funds.
I just don't believe in cheaping out to avoid short term pain, when we already know the technology is advancing and evolving in such a way that going any other route would put the lives of our pilots at risk.
|
The flip side to that argument is that new radar and detection technology may render stealth obsolete anyway. The US had a policy of "fly before you buy" untol the F-35 and now it's costing them and their allies dearly. I'm more comfortable buying proven aircraft. This silent eagle sounds pretty awesome, stealthy but can transform into the strike eagle as soon as stealth isn't needed.