Quote:
Originally Posted by First Lady
For me personally, I don't follow federal as closely; so I tend not to speak out on things I'm not well versed on.
In the boarder scope though I agree; people tend to stay silent when it is their own party. Or try to twist things as being less serious than they are (read: Slava defending PC's) LOL
I have no qualms stating when the Wildrose steps in it. Just read my blog sometime. I've been pretty hard on them.
|
I've read your blog many times, and I do give you credit for taking issue with some of the things the Wildrose has done from time to time.
I'm not just defending the PCs here actually. I just think it interesting to watch how much people will let slide if it's a party/politician they "like" in the first place doing whatever it is. Case in point:
Quote:
Originally Posted by CaptainCrunch
Redford has been a lot worse and more evasive then anyone in the federal government, with everything coming right in a row like this she should either open everything up to an impartial outside investigation or step aside until her name and the government's name is cleared.
but her continued I didn't know, and other excuses doesn't cut it and makes her look either incompetent or incredibly corrupt.
|
No, Harper was having ministers skip committee meetings, and they were intentionally withholding information. They were stone-walling every attempt to find out what was necessary when questions were asked. That's not the case here. The information is there, she just didn't do a media availability (or did for a few minutes).
Honestly, that federal fiasco was far more egregious than what this situation is. Take the partisanship out of the picture and you can see that clear as day.