Quote:
Originally Posted by Rerun
The committee felt that all three firms were equally qualified for the job.
However when it came time to pick one of the three, Redford felt that her husband's (sorry ex-husband's) firm was the best choice. I wonder why and how she arrived at that conclusion?
There was definitely a conflict of interest here when Redford selected her ex-husband's and her child's father to be the firm that would conduct the litigation.
|
And that's the primary reason why there has to be an investigation by an outside source and not a government panel.
With all of the stuff that happened with the donations to the PC's and with this, I would think that you almost have to have the same kind of investigation as what's going on in Montreal with the corruption hearings.
This has to be looked at.
If Redford was a honest politician instead of saying I don't know over and over again, she would push for a crown committee unlinked to the government.