Quote:
Originally Posted by Makarov
No, the central reason he was accused, and found guilty of, a conflict of interest is because he voted on a motion that directly affected him (i.e., whether he should pay back the ill-begotten money or not.)
|
Whereas Redford did not vote, but unilaterally awarded a contract that directly affected her ex husband (and I assume her friend) to the tune of millions of dollars.
Hmmmm voting on a motion vs. awarding a contract.
Hmmmm $3000 that went to a charity vs. Millions of $ going into your ex's pocket