Quote:
Originally Posted by crazy_eoj
Sure he was. If he hadn't done that would he have been fired? The central reason he was in any hearings at all was because of raising money for charity.
Now, if his ex-wife had been using the city letterhead, there would have been no issues.
|
No, the central reason he was accused, and found guilty of, a conflict of interest is because he voted on a motion that directly affected him (i.e., whether he should pay back the ill-begotten money or not.)