View Single Post
Old 11-28-2012, 10:12 PM   #74
Roughneck
#1 Goaltender
 
Roughneck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: the middle
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GGG View Post
I think Ford's arguement that given his Salary as mayor relative to the 3000 dollars is valid.
Then why did he say:

“[A]nd if it wasn’t for this foundation, these kids would not have had a chance. And then to ask for me to pay it out of my own pocket personally, there is just, there is no sense to this..."?

If the kids 'didn't have a chance' without the money then the amount is, according to the charity's founder, significant, is it not?

Quote:
The amount is inconsequential. For example this trial probaly lasted a day so you had 2 lawyers, a judge, a clerk minimum billing 8hrs to the case. So minimum this case cost $7500 to the taxpayer. So a conflict of interest over 3000 dollars is insignificant relative to the costs of pursuing justice.
That isn't what they determine the significance of the $3150 to.

Quote:
To say the judge did not have a choice is not true. He ruled specifically that 3000 was not an insignificant amount. I argue that this is incorrect
And so did Ford's lawyer, and he lost.
Roughneck is offline   Reply With Quote