Quote:
Originally Posted by Calgary4LIfe
I think that they definitely would care about contraction, even in Phoenix. It still detracts from revenue after all (not profits, but rather the total revenue that they will probably end up getting 50% of), as well as lost jobs.
However, it is a weak threat, as they will counter with relocation. This is why the NHL will not bring up contraction, since I am sure the NHL will spike revenues for a year by relocating Phoenix to Quebec, Hamilton or even Seattle (once those areas have arenas capable of hosting an NHL team).
I think contraction is a card that neither side wants to use in these negotiations.
|
I would say the entire reason there still isn't a (CBA)deal done, is Bettman has painted a picture of a 32-34 team NHL, if the owners stick together and reduce the players %. I'm positive he's singing there is no need for relocation to prime markets that could be better saved for expansion.