View Single Post
Old 11-21-2012, 01:47 PM   #16
Stumptown
Crash and Bang Winger
 
Stumptown's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Portland, OR
Exp:
Default

From the BuzzFeed link, this is published by BJU Press, as a science text. Here's their idea of "critical thinking:"

Quote:
Of course, a textbook provides the factual base for studying a subject. But its worldview, its methods of teaching, its depth of content, and its literary quality should promote critical and creative think#ing that is foundationally biblical.
Their entire definition of "critical thinking" is just argument from authority (the Bible).

And on their science curriculum:

Quote:
Much of modern scientific thought is influenced by an anti-God bias. We teach students to carefully analyze the theories they will encounter and to reject error in favor of pure truth and scientific fact. Every science textbook points out the infinite wisdom and designing hand of God in His creation and its laws.
I can find about 100 "errors" to reject on just those three pages. So many logical fallacies, many of them overlapping, it's hard to know where to start. This is not "teaching the controversy." This is ad hominem, ad ignorantiam, false analogy, and pretty much every other logical fallacy. So maddening that this garbage is sneaking into public schools.
Stumptown is offline   Reply With Quote