View Single Post
Old 11-05-2012, 02:45 PM   #91
doctajones428
First Line Centre
 
doctajones428's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Fort St. John, BC
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by afc wimbledon View Post
But how do you prove negligence though in this case? if it is proved by the kid dying then any parent who's kid runs into a road and gets run down is negligent. The womans lawyer will obviously argue that although foolish the woman could not forsee the accident happening, thought it was safe and so therefore it wasn't negligent.
Standing a 2 year old child (You know how much balance kids have at that age? Next to none) on a 5 foot tall fence, 14 feet above a pit of 11 killer dogs is complete negligence.

If you turned your back on a child near a busy street and they run into the street, that would be negligence. If the child somehow got loose and ran into traffic, that wouldn't be negligence.

I can't believe you compared a child in a shopping cart to someone placing a child on a rail
doctajones428 is offline   Reply With Quote